|
Modern
Logic 404-01 Fall 2005 Instructor: Dr.
Joe Salerno
by
Colin Allen and Chris Menzel |
|
|
|
Monday |
Wednesday |
||
|
Week 1 |
8/29 |
What is Logic? |
8/31 |
§1.1;1.2; and 1.3 |
|
Week 2 |
9/5 |
No Classes |
9/7 |
§2.1 QUIZ |
|
Week 3 |
9/12 |
§2.2; 2.3 |
9/14 |
§2.4 QUIZ |
|
Week 4 |
9/19 |
§2.5 |
9/21 |
§1.4 QUIZ |
|
Week 5 |
9/26 |
§1.4 |
9/28 |
§1.4 QUIZ |
|
Week 6 |
10/3 |
§1.5 |
10/5 |
§1.5 QUIZ |
|
Week 7 |
10/10 |
§1.6 |
10/12 |
Review, Bring Questions |
|
Week 8 |
10/17 |
MIDTERM EXAM |
10/19 |
§3.1, §3.2 |
|
Week 9 |
10/24 |
FALL BREAK |
10/26 |
§3.3 QUIZ |
|
Week 10 |
10/31 |
§3.3 |
11/2 |
§3.4 QUIZ |
|
Week 11 |
11/7 |
§3.4 |
11/9 |
§3.4 QUIZ |
|
Week 12 |
11/14 |
§4.1 |
11/16 |
§4.2 QUIZ |
|
Week 13 |
11/21 |
§4.3 |
11/23 |
No Classes |
|
Week 14 |
11/28 |
§4.4 |
11/30 |
§4.5 QUIZ |
|
Week 15 |
12/5 |
TBA |
12/7 |
Review, Bring Questions |
|
Finals Week |
12/12 |
Review, Bring Questions |
12/14 |
FINAL EXAM, TBA |
![]() Gottlob Frege: Published the first complete predicate logic in 1879 |
![]() Here's a book I wrote about how Frege got there. Serves nicely as an introductory text in the philosophy of language |
Course
Objectives: The course is a
study of classical propositional and predicate logic (with identity). We
develop a theory of valid inference adequate to evaluate most deductive
reasoning found in actual use. We study the concepts of consistency,
contradiction, validity, proof, logical truth, logical meaning, semantic
equivalence, and related notions. The student should emerge from the course
with reliable tools for constructing and evaluating deductive arguments.
Grading: Grading will be based
upon the performance on the 10 quizzes (2% each) and 2 exams (40% each), with
such things as improvement or serious deterioration in performance, class
participation, and willingness to seek help with course material being taken
into account where appropriate. Exams will be graded on roughly the following
0-100 point scale:
A: 90-100
B: 80-89
C: 70-79
D: 60-69
F: 0-59
This
grading scale was designed to fit the following interpretation of the various
grades:
A: A solid performance that reveals no fundamental shortcomings either in
understanding or ability to discuss the material.
B: A few serious shortcomings (or perhaps a number of minor ones) but still
clearly above a minimally acceptable performance.
C: A minimally acceptable performance, probably revealing a good number of
serious shortcomings.
D: Unacceptable performance but with some evidence that something has been
learned.
F: Inexcusable.
|
Disclaimer: pages.slu.edu is a service of Saint Louis University, Saint Louis University does not control, monitor or guarantee the information contained in these sites. For more information » |